Re: (take 2)[PATCH] JBD: positively dispose the unmapped data buffers in journal_commit_transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Jan Kara wrote:
  Hi,

I updated my patch and introduction article for it by reflecting
the comment of Andrew's.
<SNIP>

Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  I agree with the change. It's true that we can leave some anonymous
pages behind and it's nicer to the MM to release them earlier when we
know they will be never needed again. The patch looks fine to me, you
can add
  Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Thank you for confirming.

  How much have you stressed the patched kernel? I suggest you use
fsxlinux and put some memory pressure to the system...

I have stressed it for 72 or more hours.
Stresser does:
 - allocates/frees big memory(1.7GB) which was almost system
   memory size(2GB) repeatedly.
Confirmation of integrity of patched Filesystem(jbd) does:
 - creates files, and copies 3 files from created each file
   (3 copies run concurrently), and confirms whether there is
   no difference between created files and copied files.
 (20 processes runs these works concurrently and repeatedly.)
Above 2 jobs run concurrently.

I haven't ever used 'fsxlinux'.
Next time, I will use it.

Thanks,
---
Toshiyuki Okajima

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux