On Jun 23, 2008 13:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:31:07 -0600 Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > ext3_warning(sb, __func__,
> > > - "updating to rev %d because of new feature flag, "
> > > - "running e2fsck is recommended",
> > > - EXT3_DYNAMIC_REV);
> > > + "updating to rev %d because of new feature flag, "
> > > + "running e2fsck is recommended",
> > > + EXT3_DYNAMIC_REV);
> >
> > Please don't change all of the indenting. The old indending is proper
> > linux coding style (aligned with previous '('), the new one is not.
>
> Hi,
> I don't mind which way it's done, but I'm curious: are you saying that
> aligning with '(' is codified (e.g., in CodingStyle) or just that it's
> dominant?
You're right - it isn't in the Linux CodingStyle... It is the style
that we use for Lustre that explicitly requires aligning with '('.
The common stype definitely IS to align with the previous '(' if a line
is a continuation.
That said, it is IMHO bad form to go and change all of the indenting of
existing code with little reason to do so.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
