On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 06:11:31PM -0700, Mingming wrote:
> Add support for full delayed allocation over ext3 format file.
>
> This patch added a function to estimate the number of indirect blocks need
> to reserve for non-extent based (ext3) file, in order to properly
> reserve the need amount of indirect blocks for delayed allocation.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc6/fs/ext4/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc6.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c 2008-06-20 16:50:09.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc6/fs/ext4/inode.c 2008-06-20 17:36:08.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1426,6 +1426,36 @@ static int ext4_journalled_write_end(str
>
> return ret ? ret : copied;
> }
> +/*
> + * Calculate the number of metadata blocks need to reserve
> + * to allocate @blocks for non extent file based file
> + */
> +static int ext4_indirect_calc_metadata_amount(struct inode *inode, int blocks)
> +{
> + int icap = EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb);
> + int ind_blks, dind_blks, tind_blks;
> +
> + /* number of new indirect blocks needed */
> + ind_blks = (blocks + icap - 1) / icap;
> +
> + dind_blks = (ind_blks + icap - 1) / icap;
> +
> + tind_blks = 1;
> +
> + return ind_blks + dind_blks + tind_blks;
> +}
> +
With block mapped files using logical block number we should be able to
find out the exact number of meta-data blocks we would need. I am not sure
whether we need to be that complex is calculating the same.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
