Re: Performance of ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Holger Kiehl wrote:

Doing several test with '-m 0' I was unable to reproduce this and I could
now do several runs with afdbench. However the results do show that with
ext4-patch-queue it actually slower:

For ext3:             5449.76 files per second 15.58 MiB/s
For ext4:             5162.16 files per second 15.48 MiB/s
For ext4+patch-queue: 4963.6975 files per second 14.73 MiB/s

On the positive side the bonnie++ numbers got much better:

Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP ext3 16G 51501 97 210601 91 100479 32 55528 98 301589 44 1198 5 16G 52702 98 215540 94 99339 32 55376 97 300933 44 1159 4 16G 52426 99 212584 94 99091 31 55656 98 301669 44 1160 4 ext4 16G 52965 98 224199 89 108440 32 56389 99 303792 42 1526 4 16G 52792 98 223980 92 107685 32 56350 98 303066 42 1532 4 16G 52994 98 222354 92 107802 32 56386 99 303727 41 1455 4 ext4(patchqueue)16G 59727 98 252733 52 110177 25 55821 98 296739 42 1553 5 16G 61047 99 239242 48 111664 25 55706 98 297151 42 1545 4 16G 60503 99 241532 47 109655 25 55671 98 297648 42 1552 3

ext3 and ext4 tests where done with 2.6.25.4 and those with patch-queue was
2.6.26-rc5. I will do another test run with 2.6.26-rc5 without patch-queue
just to make sure that the slowdown does not happen due to changes in the
2.6.26 branch.

Here the results without patch queue:

Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
                16G 52133  98 221378 95 106873 32 55707  99 297065 42  1546   4
                16G 52042  98 220931 93 107715 32 55939  98 298810 42  1543   3
                16G 52975  98 220976 93 108060 31 56426  98 298906 42  1452   4

For afdbench: 5336.41 files per second 15.63 MiB/s

So it seems that for afdbench the ext4-patch-queue is a slowdown.

I forgot to mention that for bonnie ext4-patch-queue reduces CPU-load
a lot. For block writting it is nearly halved.

Holger

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux