On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:43:20 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It is very much preferred, thanks. > > > > (patch retained for linux-ext4 review) > > The patch itself looks fine to me, and is a good idea. I recently saw a > confused user on another fs where successful mount messages were > followed by failure mount messages with no indication of which fs had > the trouble... > > There probably are more spots in extX which could use this treatment... > should we maybe just be using ext3_warning in more places, which > automatically prints the sb, function name, etc? Good point, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
