The patch titled
ext4: don't inherit inappropriate inode flags from parent
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
ext4-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: ext4: don't inherit inappropriate inode flags from parent
From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@xxxxxxxxx>
Fix the TOPDIR flag inheritance bug reported at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866.
Some file attributes have sticky behaviour in ext2/3 whereas I believe
it should not. Namely, a directory marked with chattr +T serves "to be
the top of directory hierarchies for the purposes of the Orlov block
allocator", as the manpage says.
It seems wrong that subdirectories stickily inherit the +T flag: they
are obviously not top-level! Even files get the T attribute this way,
even though the chattr manpages only documents it for directories.
Also prevent inheritance of other flags that Andreas Dilger identified as
inappropriate to inherit
At present INDEX and EXTENTS are the only flagis that new ext4 inodes do
NOT inherit from their parent. In addition prevent the flags DIRTY, ECOMPR,
IMAGIC, TOPDIR and HUGE_FILE from being inherited.
Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 5 +++++
fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/ext4/ext4.h~ext4-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent fs/ext4/ext4.h
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h~ext4-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent
+++ a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -249,6 +249,11 @@ struct flex_groups {
#define EXT4_FL_USER_VISIBLE 0x000BDFFF /* User visible flags */
#define EXT4_FL_USER_MODIFIABLE 0x000380FF /* User modifiable flags */
+/* Flags that should be inherited by new inodes from their parent. */
+#define EXT4_FL_INHERITED ~(EXT4_DIRTY_FL | EXT4_ECOMPR_FL | EXT4_INDEX_FL |\
+ EXT4_IMAGIC_FL | EXT4_TOPDIR_FL |\
+ EXT4_HUGE_FILE_FL | EXT4_EXTENTS_FL)
+
/*
* Inode dynamic state flags
*/
diff -puN fs/ext4/ialloc.c~ext4-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent fs/ext4/ialloc.c
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c~ext4-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent
+++ a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ got:
* newly created directory and file only if -o extent mount option is
* specified
*/
- ei->i_flags = EXT4_I(dir)->i_flags & ~(EXT4_INDEX_FL|EXT4_EXTENTS_FL);
+ ei->i_flags = EXT4_I(dir)->i_flags & EXT4_FL_INHERITED;
if (S_ISLNK(mode))
ei->i_flags &= ~(EXT4_IMMUTABLE_FL|EXT4_APPEND_FL);
/* dirsync only applies to directories */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from duaneg@xxxxxxxxx are
jbd-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch
jbd-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch
jbd-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialisation-and-destruction.patch
ext2-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
ext3-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
ext4-dont-inherit-inappropriate-inode-flags-from-parent.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
