Re: Test results for ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Valerie Clement wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:

>> This was with e2fsprogs-1.39 for ext3, e2fsprogs-1.40.10 for ext4, and
>> xfsprogs-2.9.8 for xfs.
> I was using xfsprogs-2.9.0, maybe too old version...
> I'm updating them and I'll run my tests again.

2.9.0 is about a year old... 2.9.5 got some defaults changes for
perfomance reasons, so it might make a difference.  If kernel is
bleeding edge probably might as well use all bleeding-edge tools, too.  :)

...

> I added a link to the scripts I used in the test description section in:
> http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-write-2.6.26-rc2.html
> http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-readwrite-2.6.26-rc2.html

Great, thanks!  I think the hardware comparison is interesting...

-Eric

>    Valérie

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux