On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:18:19PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > Index: linux-2.6.26-rc3/fs/jbd2/transaction.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.26-rc3.orig/fs/jbd2/transaction.c 2008-05-28 16:10:41.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux-2.6.26-rc3/fs/jbd2/transaction.c 2008-05-28 16:13:16.000000000 -0700 > @@ -1656,12 +1656,42 @@ out: > return; > } > > +/* > + * jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() could race with jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() > + * The later might still hold the reference count to the buffers when inspecting > + * them on t_syncdata_list or t_locked_list. > + * > + * jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() will call this function to > + * wait for the current transaction to finish syncing data buffers, before > + * try to free that buffer. > + * > + * Called with journal->j_state_lock hold. > + */ We are taking the spin_lock again in the function ?? > +static void jbd2_journal_wait_for_transaction_sync_data(journal_t *journal) > +{ > + transaction_t *transaction = NULL; > + tid_t tid; > + > + spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock); > + transaction = journal->j_committing_transaction; > + > + if (!transaction) { > + spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); > + return; > + } > + > + tid = transaction->t_tid; > + spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); > + jbd2_log_wait_commit(journal, tid); > +} [.... snip.... ] > + if (ret == 0 && (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) && (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) { > + spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock); > + jbd2_journal_wait_for_transaction_sync_data(journal); > + ret = try_to_free_buffers(page); > + spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); > + } > + > busy: > return ret; > } > > -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html