On Thu, 29 May 2008, Jan Kara wrote:
> > /usr/src/devel/fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_find_next_bit':
> > /usr/src/devel/fs/ext4/mballoc.c:399: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic_find_next_le_bit'
> >
> > This has been happening for months.
> Is there anything wrong with the obvious fix (below)? I don't have a
> way to even compile-test this...
Yes. Including the header only provides the prototype of
generic_find_next_le_bit(), not the actual implementation. So it will
still fail at link time.
There exists a patch to fix it, but I haven't tested it yet. Will do (when
time permits), hopefully before 2.6.26...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
