Re: [PATCH 0/4] (RESEND) ext3[34] barrier changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:29:49 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:03:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > afaik there is no need to enable this feature if the machine (actually
> > the disks) are on a UPS, yes?
> 
> Yes, as long as you're confident that there won't be a kernel
> bug/regression causing a lockup while the server is under severe
> memory pressure while doing lots of fsync's, file creations, renames,
> etc.

That won't cause corruption, will it?  The problem is purely one of
"data which the disk acked didn't make it to platter"?

>  And as long as your 100% confident that UPS's will never fail,
> janitors will never accidentally hit the Emergency Power Office
> switch, and so on.

Well.  The product of two very small numbers is...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux