Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> With mballoc we search for the best extent using different
> criteria. We should always use the goal group when we are
> starting with a new criteria.
Aneesh, is there any testcase etc that will demonstrate the resulting
difference in layout?
It's not clear to me from this changelog (without looking at a lot more
context) exactly what you're changing and why...
thanks,
-eric
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 2a6c814..9b4cde7 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -1730,10 +1730,6 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start = sbi->s_mb_last_start;
> spin_unlock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
> }
> -
> - /* searching for the right group start from the goal value specified */
> - group = ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group;
> -
> /* Let's just scan groups to find more-less suitable blocks */
> cr = ac->ac_2order ? 0 : 1;
> /*
> @@ -1743,6 +1739,12 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> repeat:
> for (; cr < 4 && ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_CONTINUE; cr++) {
> ac->ac_criteria = cr;
> + /*
> + * searching for the right group start
> + * from the goal value specified
> + */
> + group = ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < EXT4_SB(sb)->s_groups_count; group++, i++) {
> struct ext4_group_info *grp;
> struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
