Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix text_poke

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:

text_poke() itself only applies/unapplies the LOCK prefix - a single byte. We shouldnt be doing that at all: the cost of LOCK is insignificant (a few cycles) and most systems are SMP anyway.


Alas, on older CPUs the cost of LOCK can be massive. The question is how much we really care - the embedded people (who would definitely be affected) will simply build UP kernels, and this only affects booting SMP kernels on UP.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux