2008/4/23, Pekka J Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > We should have returned from the function and not printed this message. If > > we somehow skipped the test for !fault then end could have wrapped around > > which gets us to 4GB. > > > Aah, looks like it's just a silly bug in slab_fix(). If this looks ok to > Christoph, can you re-test with this patch applied Zdenek? That way we'll > actually know where SLUB expected to see POISON_INUSE. Unfortunately it won't be easy to retest - I just know it happened to me with some wi-fi networking interaction after resume. I'll rebuild kernel with these slab patches - but I have now idea how to trigger the bug. In the attachment is bzip-ed dmesg in case it would be still needed for something. Zdenek
Attachment:
messages.txt.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
