On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:20:14PM +0400, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > Hello, guys. > > > > It seems like the Linux-fountation was not able to find a mentor for > > my project. If somebody is willing to mentor this project through the > > Google Summer of Code, please contact Rik and me now, as little > > time is left. > > > > A link to the application: > > http://rom.etherboot.org/share/xl0/gsoc2008/application-linux-foundation.txt > > Hi Alexey, > > I really don't think your project is likely to be successful given the > 3 month timeframe of a GSoC. At least not without a mentor spending > vast amounts of time educating you about how things works within ext2 > and e2fsck. Even given some broad hints about problems that you need > to address, you still have not addressed how you will solve > fundamental race conditions resulting from trying to read the multiple > blocks scattered all over the disk which comprise allocation bitmap > blocks while allocations might be taking place, for example. > > Your approach of monitoring writes to the buffer cache for metadata > writes is completely busted; suppose the kernel modifies block #12345 > in the filesystem; how do you know what that means? Could that be an > indirect block? If so, to which inode does it belong? Sorry, I still don't understand where the problem is. If it is a block containing a metadata object fsck has already read, than we already know what kind of object it is (there must be a way to quickly find all cached objects derived from a given block), and can update the cached version. And if fsck has not yet read the block, it can just be ignored, no matter what kind of data it contains. If it contains metadata and fsck is intrested in it, it will read it sooner or later anyway. If it contains file data, why should fsck even care? And you are wrong if you think this problem never came to me. This is in fact what motivated the design, and there is no coincidence it is not affected. (well, at least I think it is not affected). But you are probably right, this project may be not doable in just three months. The changes on the kernel side probably are, but there is a huge e2fsck work. > If all you are > doing is monitoring metadata blocks, you would have no idea! The fact > that it apparently didn't even occur to you that this might be a > show-stopping problem scares the heck out of me. It leads me to > believe that this project is very likely to fail, and/or will require > vast amounts of time from the mentor. Unfortunately, the former is > something that I just don't have this summer. > > Regards, > > - Ted > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
