On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:22:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >... > > > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1: > > >... > > > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch > > > > > > ext4 doesn't build on m68k > > >... > > > > Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as > > 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to > > fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm? > > Yes, it's the bitops screwup. > > I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something > might be happening. > It would really help if we can get some m68k people to look at patch i posted. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/5944 -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
