On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:12:40 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:13:11PM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote: > > From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > New bitmap and inode table allocation for FLEX_BG > > > > Change the way we allocate bitmaps and inode tables if the FLEX_BG > > feature is used at mke2fs time. It places calculates a new offset for > > bitmaps and inode table base on the number of groups that the user > > wishes to pack together using the new "-G" option. Creating a > > filesystem with 64 block groups in a flex group can be done by: > > I was just testing out this patch, and it looks like it creates a > filesystem with an incorrect free blocks count when creating a > filesystem with both uninit_groups and flex_bg. Can you look at this, > please? > > - Ted I blame Undo Manager for being so slow that cause me to skip some of the testing needed to be done. I was incorrectly checking the feature flag instead of checking the value of fs->super->s_log_groups_per_flex. Fixed patch is on its way. -JRS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html