[E2FSPROGS, PATCH] e2fsck: Don't object to extents flags on deleted fast symlinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks to Aneesh Kumar for pointing this out.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
---
 e2fsck/pass1.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index 79e9f23..67a8370 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -713,14 +713,6 @@ void e2fsck_pass1(e2fsck_t ctx)
 			}
 		}
 
-		if (extent_fs && (inode->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) &&
-		    LINUX_S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) &&
-		    !ext2fs_inode_has_valid_blocks(inode) &&
-		    fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_FAST_SYMLINK_EXTENT_FL, &pctx)) {
-			inode->i_flags &= ~EXT4_EXTENTS_FL;
-			e2fsck_write_inode(ctx, ino, inode, "pass1");
-		}
-
 		if (ino == EXT2_BAD_INO) {
 			struct process_block_struct pb;
 			
@@ -925,6 +917,14 @@ void e2fsck_pass1(e2fsck_t ctx)
 		check_inode_extra_space(ctx, &pctx);
 		check_is_really_dir(ctx, &pctx, block_buf);
 
+		if (extent_fs && (inode->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) &&
+		    LINUX_S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) &&
+		    !ext2fs_inode_has_valid_blocks(inode) &&
+		    fix_problem(ctx, PR_1_FAST_SYMLINK_EXTENT_FL, &pctx)) {
+			inode->i_flags &= ~EXT4_EXTENTS_FL;
+			e2fsck_write_inode(ctx, ino, inode, "pass1");
+		}
+
 		if (LINUX_S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
 			ext2fs_mark_inode_bitmap(ctx->inode_dir_map, ino);
 			e2fsck_add_dir_info(ctx, ino, 0);
-- 
1.5.4.1.144.gdfee-dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux