On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:13:03AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Yep, there were 2 problems.
>
> One was that inode_scan_and_fix() wasn't moving all of large inodes.
>
> The other was that ext2fs_swap_inode_full was doing bad things for
> in-inode attrs on big endian boxes, that was the patch in this thread
> which isn't in the repo yet, but is in fact needed.
>
> I suppose that the iterative nature of my fix for this problem didn't
> help Ted keep things straight, sorry.
I actually *prefer* multiple patches, actually, but what works best
when there is a series of patches is to resend the whole patch stack
using git-format-patch or git-send-email --- or set up your own git
repository on the network (or use repo.or.cz) and send me a pull
request. But that requires much more use of git. :-)
In any case, I'll pull in the last change, and this time I promise
I'll be careful about remembering to use --author. That *is*
something I should be doing, but I certainly appreciate people using
git's facilities to make my life easier, thanks.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
