On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
Technically, I guess you could say the on-disk format changed, but as I mentioned, it's going to change back to the original format. It's not a big deal. The question is for long symlinks, where the symlink can't fit in the 60 bytes in the i_block[] array, whether the block number should be encoded as a single integer as i_block[0], as it is under ext3, or whether it should be encoded as an extents structure.
Thanks again for the explanation (and for the fix, I shall try it soon)! Christian. -- BOFH excuse #399: We are a 100% Microsoft Shop. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
