On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:56:29AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2008 22:28 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:25:37PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > I agree here. IMHO the better option would be to just build the
> > > extent-tree for converted inode on best-effort basis. If we find in
> > > the end that someone has allocated new block to the file (via mmap
> > > filling a hole) while we are converting, we can just cancel the
> > > conversion. Because I think the cost of extra rwsem (both in terms of
> > > additional memory needed for each inode structure and in time needed for
> > > rwsem acquisitions) is more than I as a user would like to bear given
> > > how rare the conversion is.
> >
> > Something like the below ??
> >
> > down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> > + /* check for number of blocks */
> > + if (total_blocks != inode->i_blocks) {
> > + retval = -EAGAIN;
> > + up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> > + goto err_out;
>
> Is this enough, or should we use the inode version instead
We are already holding inode->i_mutex. So the only possible operation is
adding new blocks via mmap write to holes. Also inode version is tricky
because it is available only with i_version mount option. We are also
interested only in new blocks added event.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
