Re: [PATCH] [RFC] New fsck option to ignore device-mapper crypto devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 18:04 +0100, Matthias Koenig wrote:
> Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> > Should field 8 of /etc/fstab (fs_passno) be zero for these mount points?
> > Is there any reason for it to be anything different?
> 
> Why? zero would mean that they should never get checked.
> I think it is reasonable to have the choice to get your crypto
> filesystems checked. Current practise for SuSE has been to allow
> only 0, but checked this filesystem anyway, which has lead to complaints.
> So we want to do this more consistent.

Zero tells fsck not to check the filesystem during reboot.  It's what
tells fsck -A which filesystems to check.  If we don't expect the
filesystem to be check-able during that phase, a non-zero value won't
have any real meaning.
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux