Theodore Tso wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 08:31:13PM +0100, Bas van Schaik wrote: > >>> Yeah, it could be quite big, given that you have a 3TB filesystem. That's >>> why I suggested the "or given me login access to the system", although >>> understand there could be all sorts of privacy and security issues >>> involved with that request. >>> >> The dump is not ready yet... >> >> Whatever we will do, it will have to wait for a week and a half. For now I >> really appreciate all the help. >> > Ok, when you get back, I should also have a patch for you that will > allow the "XXX should never happen" message to display more > information, so if the dump is too big for us to move over the > network, I'll have another way of doing some remote debugging. > Last night I returned from my holiday trip, so I'm available again. The e2image dump completed somewhere during my absence and has grown to 1.6 gigabytes (bzip2), too large to actually publish if you ask me. I think it is okay to provide you access to the system, please contact me (preferably using a GPG-encrypted message) so we can agree on the details. Of course it would be great if you can send a patch which will make e2fsck more verbose. -- Bas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
