On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:43:33 -0500 Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Although I've checked to make sure that each of these topic branches > passes "make check" on their own, the combined pu branch is failing > due to what appears to be unfortunate interactions between js/flex-bg > and js/uninit. This *may* be because I botched the merge, which got > tricky when I merged in js/uninit into the pu branch which already had > js/flex-bg. If someone could take a look at the misc/mke2fs.c changes > in "git show bffaaf74", I'd much appreciate it. The misc/mke2fs.c changes look sane to me. > * js/flex-bg (Wed Feb 13 20:47:50 2008 -0600) 1 commit > - e2fsprogs: New bitmap and inode table allocation for FLEX_BG v2 > > I've noticed that this patch is slightly different from what > Jose sent in for the e2fsprogs-interim branch, so I'm a little > concerned about which is the latest, or whether the > differences are intentional. Jose, if you have time, could > you take a look at commits cb676995 and 8072fe6 and perhaps comment? There where slight differences in misc/mke2fs.c that required making a different patch for the e2fsprogs-interim branch. The patches are functionally the same. -JRS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
