* Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The following was meant 100% seriously:
>
> This patch has been sent on:
> - 16 May 2006
> - 1 May 2006
> - 23 Apr 2006
ouch ...
i guess this explains what static code metrics already suggest:
$ code-quality fs/ext3/ fs/ext4/
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
fs/ext3/ 408 16055 25.4
fs/ext4/ 394 25169 15.6
compared to:
$ code-quality kernel/
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
kernel/ 739 98759 7.4
and i guess our hope is now in:
$ code-quality fs/btrfs/
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
fs/btrfs/ 240 20556 11.6
(which hopefully will be a project done in a much more Linux-ish manner:
open participation, the easy taking of patches, an inclusive,
newbie-friendly contribution atmosphere, etc.)
Ingo
ps. http://redhat.com/~mingo/x86.git/code-quality
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
