On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:00 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:15:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:36:26 -0500 Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the > > > > ext4 patchset. > > > > > > That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up. How quickly > > > will you be able to merge David's iget converstion patches? > > > > They're about 1,000 patches back. > > OK, if you're not planning on pushing David's changes to Linus right > away, what if I pull in David's > > iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch > > and push it plus some other ext4 bug fixes directly to Linus, and let > you know when that has happened so you can drop David's patch from > your queue? > > David's changes to ext4 can be applied standalone without the rest of > his series, so it would be safe to push that to Linus independently > and in advance of the rest of his series. I get compile error when builing ext4 patch queue with iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch applied, against 2.6.24-git14. It seems iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch depends on patches: [PATCH 01/31] Add an ERR_CAST() macro to complement ERR_PTR and co. [PATCH 03/32] IGET: Introduce a function to register iget failure Mingming > That should also help > reduce the number of inter-patch queue dependencies. > > Regards, > > - Ted > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
