Andreas Dilger wrote: > Eric, I haven't looked at the FC8/9 e2fsprogs yet, but do they also have > a ton of patches (possibly in the -pu branch), or do they track upstream > more closely? I try to track upstream as closely as I can; F8 had quite a lot of patches for a while, and I got it whittled down to just a couple. I think I'm back up to 7 though :) Patch1: e2fsprogs-1.39-blkid-devmapper.patch Patch2: e2fsprogs-1.38-etcblkid.patch Patch3: e2fsprogs-1.39-mkinstalldirs.patch Patch4: e2fsprogs-1.40.4-uuidd-tidy.patch Patch5: e2fsprogs-1.40.4-sb_feature_check_ignore.patch Patch6: e2fsprogs-1.40.4-blkid-ext4dev.patch Patch7: e2fsprogs-1.40.4-no-static-e2fsck.patch ... # look at device mapper devices - # autoconf-foo to find ldevmapper in /lib %patch1 -p1 -b .dm # put blkid.tab in /etc/blkid/ - fedora-ism I think %patch2 -p1 -b .etcblkid # Fix for newer autoconf (#220715) - only 'cause we must # re-run autoconf due to patch 1 IIRC %patch3 -p1 -b .mkinstalldirs # uuidd manpage tidyup <--- sent upstream already %patch4 -p1 -b .uuidd-tidy # ignore some flag differences on primary/backup sb feature checks # sent (bad... ) patch upstream, will resend # ignores flags set on the fly by the kernel %patch5 -p1 -b .featurecheck # teach blkid about ext4dev, for now %patch6 -p1 -b .ext4-blkid # completely clobber e2fsck.static build, # fedora is missing some .a's, and don't need it %patch7 -p1 -b .e2fsck-static > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
