On Fri, January 18, 2008 20:16, Mingming Cao wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 21:35 +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote: >> i_file_acl and i_dir_acl aren't always needed. >> >> With certain configs this makes 10 ext3_inode_cache objects fit in >> one slab instead of the current 9, as the size shrinks from 416 to >> 408 bytes for 32 bit, !POSIX_ACL and !EXT3_FS_XATTR configs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/ext3/ialloc.c | 2 ++ >> fs/ext3/inode.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- >> include/linux/ext3_fs_i.h | 2 ++ >> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext3/ialloc.c b/fs/ext3/ialloc.c >> index 1bc8cd8..01745bc 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext3/ialloc.c >> +++ b/fs/ext3/ialloc.c >> @@ -574,8 +574,10 @@ got: >> ei->i_frag_no = 0; >> ei->i_frag_size = 0; >> #endif >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL >> ei->i_file_acl = 0; >> ei->i_dir_acl = 0; >> +#endif > > For regular file, i_dir_acl is being reused as i_size_high to support > large file. Only the i_dir_acl of struct ext3_inode, not the one from ext3_inode_info. Thanks, Indan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
