On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:00:20 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:14:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function `ext4_mb_generate_buddy': > > fs/ext4/mballoc.c:836: error: implicit declaration of function `ext2_find_next_bit' > > > I actually sent in a patch which changes asking for review to > linux-arch. I haven't got the response yet. Don't expect one... > Attaching the patch > below > Introduce ext4_find_next_bit > > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This gets used by the ext4 multi block allocator patches. > > Also add generic_find_next_le_bit > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > include/asm-arm/bitops.h | 2 + > include/asm-generic/bitops/ext2-non-atomic.h | 2 + > include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h | 4 ++ > include/asm-m68k/bitops.h | 2 + > include/asm-m68knommu/bitops.h | 2 + > include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h | 4 ++ > include/asm-s390/bitops.h | 2 + > include/linux/ext4_fs.h | 1 + > lib/find_next_bit.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ May as well merge it I guess. I'll do that. Possibly it should be merged into the ext4 tree instead, so that people can build the ext4 devel tree on other architectures but obviously there's no call for that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
