Re: More testing: 4x parallel 2G writes, sequential reads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shapor Naghibzadeh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:42:59PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Again this was on a decent HW raid so seek penalties are probably not
>> too bad.
> 
> You may want to verify that by doing a benchmark on the raw device.  I
> recently did some benchmarks doing random I/O on a Dell 2850 w/ a PERC
> (megaraid) RAID5 w/ 128MB onboard writeback cache and 6x 15krpm drives
> and noticed appoximately one order of magnitude throughput drop on
> small (stripe-sized) random reads versus linear.  It maxed out at ~100
> random read IOPs or "seeks/sec" (suprisingly low).
> 
> Out of curiousity, how are you counting the seeks?

Chris Mason's seekwatcher (google can find it for you) is doing the
graphing, it uses blocktrace for the raw data.

-Eric

> Shapor

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux