Re: [PATCH][RFC]JBD2: Fix journal checksum kernel oops on NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 00:15 +0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 05, 2007  08:04 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 09:36 +0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > But...  this implies that every user of bh->b_data needs to kmap, and I
> > > don't see that in the code anywhere else.  That makes me think something
> > > else is going wrong here.
> > 
> > Most cases, this is handled in ll_rw_block() code - when we submit the
> > buffer head for IO. If the page is in highmem, we will end up creating
> > a bounce bufer for it. 
> > 
> > In our case, JBD code is trying to look at the data to do checksum
> > on it. Thats why we have to kmap() the page before looking.
> 
> My point is that there is a LOT of code in ext[234] that dereferences
> bh->b_data without kmap() (e.g. group descriptors, bitmaps, superblock,
> inode tables, etc).  Does that imply that something is forcing those
> bh pages into lowmem, or is the journal bh page in question being
> allocated in some different way that allows it to be in highmem?

Yes. You are right. Its been a while since I had to deal with HIGHMEM.
All the meta-data should be in LOWMEM. I asked Mingming to verify
what the buffer-head is pointing to when it has HIGHMEM page.

Thanks,
Badari

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux