Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > @@ -1279,6 +1280,9 @@ clear_qf_name: > case Opt_delalloc: > set_opt (sbi->s_mount_opt, DELALLOC); > break; If delalloc, mballoc, extents are the new defaults, is there a reason to keep them as options? When would you need to specify -o extents, now, for example? (though my brain is fuzzy today, maybe I'm missing something) If this were not a filesystem ending in "dev" I could see keeping it for compatibility with existing fstabs.... > + case Opt_nodelalloc: > + clear_opt (sbi->s_mount_opt, DELALLOC); > + break; > case Opt_mballoc: > set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, MBALLOC); > break; > @@ -1824,6 +1828,8 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > * User -o noextents to turn it off > */ I'd either update this comment ^^^^ or remove it, I think. > set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, EXTENTS); > + set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, DELALLOC); > + set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, MBALLOC); > > if (!parse_options ((char *) data, sb, &journal_inum, &journal_devnum, > NULL, 0)) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
