Mingming Cao wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 17:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
I have updated the patch queue at
http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/
http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/ext4-patch-queue.tar
Changes:
a) Add large-file-blocktype.patch large-file.patch patch.
Could you send them out separately? I noticed that your queue is not
based on the last ext4 patch queue. You modified mballoc-core.patch
directly with large file block type changes...but your updated
mballoc-core.patch doesn't have the latest proc fs fix from Ted.
It has the changes. http://www.radian.org/~kvaneesh/ext4/patch-series/mballoc-core.patch
I searched for PROC_FS . I did a git pull on patch queue before updating the patches.
I would appreciate if you separete the largeblocktype changes for
mballoc out of the core mballoc changes, as that patch is getting really
big already.
b) Add the stable-boundary-patch with dummy change
c) Add stable-boundary-undo.patch which undo the above dummy change.
The stable-boundary patch is being removed from ext4 patch queue,as some
tools expect a meaning code diff to apply any patch.
That is why i added a dummy change which is reverted by the later patch.
-aneesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
