On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rc9/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc9.orig/fs/jbd/transaction.c 2007-10-05 12:08:08.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc9/fs/jbd/transaction.c 2007-10-05 12:08:29.000000000 -0700
> @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ static int start_this_handle(journal_t *
>
> alloc_transaction:
> if (!journal->j_running_transaction) {
> - new_transaction = jbd_kmalloc(sizeof(*new_transaction),
> - GFP_NOFS);
> + new_transaction = kmalloc(sizeof(*new_transaction),
> + GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
Why was a __GFP_NOFAIL added here? I do not see a use of jbd_rep_kmalloc?
> -#define jbd_kmalloc(size, flags) \
> - __jbd_kmalloc(__FUNCTION__, (size), (flags), journal_oom_retry)
journal_oom_retry is no longer used?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
