Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 04-10-07 13:12:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:35:46 -0700
> Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > ext2: Avoid rec_len overflow with 64KB block size
> > 
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > With 64KB blocksize, a directory entry can have size 64KB which does not fit
> > into 16 bits we have for entry lenght. So we store 0xffff instead and convert
> > value when read from / written to disk.
> 
> This patch clashes in non-trivial ways with
> ext2-convert-to-new-aops-fix.patch and perhaps other things which are
> already queued for 2.6.24 inclusion, so I'll need to ask for an updated
> patch, please.
> 
> Also, I'm planing on merging the ext2 reservations code into 2.6.24, so if
> we're aiming for complete support of 64k blocksize in 2.6.24's ext2,
> additional testing and checking will be needed.
  OK, I'll fixup those rejects and send a new patch.

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux