Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:25:39AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: >>> Nope, there isn't much rationale unless we also split out fsck, so >> util-linux-ng is open for fsck :-) > > It's something I'm considering, but at the moment I've got some higher > priority (ext4) work that I'm focusing on. > > What would you think about moving libblkid and the libdisk from > xfsprogs into util-linux-ng? That's things that I've been batting > around doing, although that means we end up moving more libraries that > distros would probably want separated into different packages into > util-linux-ng.... Heh, sounds a little like a prisoner exchange... "we'll give up libblkid & libcom_err if you give up libdisk" :) Seriously, though, that all sounds like a pretty good idea to me, especially since e2fsprogs has been making noise about utilizing some of the functionality in xfsprogs (stripe discovery etc). -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
