Jose R. Santos wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:29:27 -0700 > Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:06 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote: >>> From: Jose R. Santos <jrs@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> ext4: FLEX_BG Kernel support v2. >>> >>> @@ -702,13 +702,15 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino) >>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010 >>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040 /* extents support */ >>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080 >>> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG 0x0200 >> Any reason why 0x100 is skipped ? >> >> Thanks, >> Badari >> > > Because 0x0100 is reserved for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MMP in e2fsprogs. and we know that how? :) I'd at least put a comment into the kernel code so it doesn't get taken, later. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
