On Aug 04, 2007 00:20 +0800, Coly Li wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Eric Sandeen wrote: > > There's a fair amount of code around this never-implemented concept; > > should it be removed? :) > > I agree with this idea. It seems we will never implement it in future, > once "fragment" packed into inode. Yes, this should all be removed. In fact, the "fragment" fields are being reassigned in the upstream e2fsprogs, so there is no chance to implement it in the future either. If we ever want to have fragments like this, the plan was to add them as EAs in the inode (no point to make an external EA block to hold a block of data). Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
