Re: ext4-patch-queue rebased to 2.6.22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 10, 2007  23:25 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > It might even make sense to change the other #define to be called
> > EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN so people have to think about this when using the #define.
> 
> Done. Changes are in ext4 patch queue.
> Can you please have a quick look and see if this is what you preferred ?

Yes, it looks good, though I wonder if it also makes sense to change the
ext4_ext_*_uninitialized() code to use EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN instead of 0x8000,
since that makes it a bit clearer that the two are related.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux