On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 12:40 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 01:30 +0800, coly li wrote: > > Hi, once we decide to do this, how about storing inode inside the > > directory ? > > Which directory? I think Coly is refering to the idea of store-inode-inside-in-directory-file. It's one way to implement the dynamic inode table allocation. With it you don't have system-wide inode tables anymore, but all inode structures are directly stored in the directory file. > > > IMHO, the latter one is more attractive :-) > > Sounds like a mess to me. Consider ln and mv. > > > Coly > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
