Theodore Tso wrote: >> 5) If the test went by without any errors the test image is deleted and >> in case of any errors the user is notified that the log of this test run >> should be mailed to linux-ext4@ and the image should be preserved. > > I certainly like the general concept!! > > I wonder if the code to create a random filesystem and corrupting it > should be kept as separate shell script, since it can be reused in > another of interesting ways. One thought would be to write a test > script that mounts corrupted filesystems using UML and then does some > exercises on it (tar cvf on the filesyste, random renames on the > filesystem, rm -rf of all of the contents of the filesystems), to see > whether we can provoke a kernel oops. FWIW, that's what fsfuzzer does, in an fs-agnostic way. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
