On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:53 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jul 06, 2007 09:51 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > The use of a mount option means the change attribute could be > > inconsistent across mounts. If we really need this, wouldn't it make > > more sense for it to be a persistent feature of the filesystem, set at > > mkfs time? > > Yes, having it stored into the superblock in s_flags is probably a good > idea. Kalpak, do you think you could get a patch that adds e.g. > EXT4_FLAGS_NO_INODE_VERSION (like EXT4_FLAGS_SIGNED_HASH in e2fsprogs). > Per our ext4 interlock discussion today, I have dropped the ext4-no-inode version-mount-option patch from ext4 patch queue. Thanks, Mingming - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
