Re: [PATCH] Faster ext2_clear_inode()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 July 2007 22:01:48 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> 
> Yes. Note that ext2_clear_inode() is referenced from ext2_sops, so even
> empty, it leaves traces in resulting kernel.

Is that your opinion or have you actually measured a difference?
I strongly suspect that compilers are smart enough to optimize away a
call to an empty static function.

Jörn

-- 
Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small.
Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is
frequently going to be big, don't get fancy.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux