On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 09:52:55AM +0800, LIOU Payphone wrote:
>
> What makes me puzzled is there are two entries both named "3220" with ino
> "3350" were shown under "/mnt" when I "ls -li /mnt".
Hmm. I still can't verify this.
Can you replicate the result? If so, can you send me the output of
dumpe2fs?
> The version of kernel is 2.6.17-1.2142; and e2fsprogs-1.28.
That looks like a vendor version of the kernel; what distribution are
you using?
E2fsprogs 1.28 is a frighteningly old version of e2fsprogs. Did you
really mean 1.28? Or 1.38?
> You know that we can set "s_def_hash_version" to be "DX_HASH_LEAGCY" in
> function "main{}" of mke2fs.c
Oh, so you were modifying your sources to set this variable?
> But I don't know why the latest version e2fsprogs-1.39 takes "DX_HASH_TEA"
> for default. Why "DX_HASH_LEAGCY" cannot be taken for default? Could you
> tell me the reason for it? Thanks. :-)
Because DX_HASH_TEA is a better hash, and because it is keyed off of a
per-filesystem secret hash value stored in the superblock.
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
