On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:10 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 17:36 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > > We've missed the -rc1 merge window, so the goal should be to make sure > > that everything in the series file before the "unstable patches" is > > ready for merging. > > > I tend to agree. But there are some bug-fix type or mount option > patches that can try to target for rc2, what do you think? I agree with Mingming. There's no reason for these patches not to be in mainline. I am curious why the fallocate patches were put at the top of the series file in the first place. The older patches shouldn't be held up by fallocate (which should wait until the next merge window). Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
