Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Apr 20, 2007 12:10 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
If ext3 can do 16T, ext2 probably should be able to as well.
There are still "int" block containers in the block allocation path
that need to be fixed up.
Yeah, but who wants to do 16TB e2fsck on every boot? I think there
needs to be some limits imposed for the sake of usability.
I figure this is in the fine tradition of "enough rope to hang oneself"
If you have 16T of filesystem you probably know enough to not hang
yourself this way.
*shrug*
It's a bug, today. If we need another change to limit ext2 to 500G or
something, fine by me. :)
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
