Re: Ext3 behavior on power failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 28-03-07 10:17:33, armangau_philippe@xxxxxxx wrote:
> In my case the disk cache is not a  problem - We use an emc disk array
> the write cache is protected - 
> Once the data has made over the disk array we can assume it is safe - 
  Then if you are able to reproduce the situation that not all data
is written after fsync(); poweroff; that is a bug worth reporting..

								Honza
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. [mailto:jakj@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 9:17 AM
> To: Jan Kara
> Cc: wheeler, richard; armangau, philippe; ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; csar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Ext3 behavior on power failure
> 
> >  If you fsync() your data, you are guaranteed that also your data are
> > safely on disk when fsync returns. So what is the question here?
> 
> Pardon a newbie's intrusion, but I do know this isn't true. There is a 
> window of possible loss because of the multitude of layers of caching, 
> especially within the drive itself. Unless there is a
> super_duper_fsync() 
> that is able to actually poll the hardware and get a confirmation that
> the 
> internal buffers are purged?
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux