On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:49:39 -0700 Avantika Mathur wrote: > Ext4 Developer Interlock Call: 03/14/2007 Meeting Minutes > > Attendees: Mingming Cao, Eric Sandeen, Ted Ts'o, Dave Kleikamp, Suparna Bhattacharya, Takashi Sato, Avantika Mathur > > Minutes can be accessed at: http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Developer%27s_Conference_Call > > > Ext4 git Tree: > > - Shaggy and Eric fixed the recent problems with the nanosecond timestamps in the git tree > > - There is a general problem that the git tree is not updated frequently > > - Ted feels there is not enough testing done to feel comfortable updating to a new release > > -- Many of the patches added to the tree are not tested properly. > -- It would be helpful if people could pick up the tree and test it, and make sure all upstream merging criteria is met by ext4 developers. > > - Currently looking at methods of automating testing of each new git tree release on different architectures and benchmarks. > > - Slow code review is also slowing down ext4. > > - Ted suggested maintaining a git tree that tracks the patch queue, so there can be multiple people working on the patch queue. > - When patches are stable, update the central git tree that can then be pushed upstream. > > - Ted will start a second git tree, and initially put Shaggy and Mingming as additional users who can access the tree. Hi, What's the purpose of this second git tree, please? --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
