> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:29:05 -0500 Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 10:05 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > And broken stuff too :-) > > > The nanoseconds patch is broken on x86_64 - makes mtimes from the future: > > > e.g. year 2431. I suspect an endianness issue. > > > x86 works fine according to my sources. > > > > > > The files themselves have correct mtimes, as booting previous kernel > > > or one w/o the nanoseconds patch works fine. > > There were later patches posted to the list after this version, I think, which > > are not yet in Ted's tree... I'll find some time today to test the "take3" version > > on x86_64, unless someone beats me to it. > > I didn't quite beat you to it, but I did make a diff to bring > 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 in tune with the "take3" patch. It makes the code easier > to understand, but I'm not sure if it contains anything to fix the bug. > Code inspection hasn't gotten me any closer to figuring out what's > wrong. > > Shaggy It's possible that I screwed up merging Ted's tree into mainline - it spat some rejects, and needs updating to 2.6.21-rc3. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
