Re: e2fsck and human intervention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 06, 2007  09:27 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> OK. Given that write caching may be required for performance reasons or
> there might be other possible reasons which would result in
> preen-unrepairable fs corruption on power loss, my question is now: Is
> it a really bad idea to run "e2fsck -y" on every boot?

If your primary concern is not halting the boot, then yes.  99% of people
only know to answer "y" to e2fsck anyways.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux