Re: [PATCH Take2 1/1] Nanosecond timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:46:44PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.20/fs/ext4/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.20.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ linux-2.6.20/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2676,10 +2676,11 @@ void ext4_read_inode(struct inode * inod
>  	}
>  	inode->i_nlink = le16_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_links_count);
>  	inode->i_size = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_size);
> -	inode->i_atime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_atime);
> -	inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_ctime);
> -	inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_mtime);
> -	inode->i_atime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = 0;
> +
> +	EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(i_ctime, i_ctime_extra, ei, inode, raw_inode);
> +	EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(i_mtime, i_mtime_extra, ei, inode, raw_inode);
> +	EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(i_atime, i_atime_extra, ei, inode, raw_inode);
> +	EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(i_crtime, i_crtime_extra, ei, ei, raw_inode);

ei->i_extra_isize is not yet initialized at this point (it is set a couple of
lines lower).
I guess the consequence of this is that nanosecond timestamps are always
discarded since ei->i_extra_isize is equal to 0.

Cheers,
Johann
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux